<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fakeconomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fakeconomy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fakeconomy.com</link>
	<description>Stories, pictures and insights from your target demographic: a 25-30 year old male</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:59:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by admin</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Hey, just a quick update.  I went to Montreal and tried the silent mode on the camera.  It was completely silent (and I was taking pics inside the Notre Dame Basilica which amplifies everything).  So if you are still in the market this will take silent pics (no shutter sounds, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just a quick update.  I went to Montreal and tried the silent mode on the camera.  It was completely silent (and I was taking pics inside the Notre Dame Basilica which amplifies everything).  So if you are still in the market this will take silent pics (no shutter sounds, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 4 Activation &amp; Comparison to Touch and iPhone 3G by admin</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2010/06/iphone-4/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/?p=713#comment-514</guid>
		<description>It is thicker than the Touch, but it is significantly thinner then the 3G/3GS.  This is my first iPhone, before that I had been using the Touch (the one in the photo&#039;s).  I&#039;m still amazed that after adding in a phone they were able to keep the thickness down to what it is. I still use the Touch when I&#039;m in the gym but the iPhone gets almost all my attention now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is thicker than the Touch, but it is significantly thinner then the 3G/3GS.  This is my first iPhone, before that I had been using the Touch (the one in the photo&#8217;s).  I&#8217;m still amazed that after adding in a phone they were able to keep the thickness down to what it is. I still use the Touch when I&#8217;m in the gym but the iPhone gets almost all my attention now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 4 Activation &amp; Comparison to Touch and iPhone 3G by pat</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2010/06/iphone-4/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/?p=713#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I appears that the iPhone 4 is thicker than the touch from your pics, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appears that the iPhone 4 is thicker than the touch from your pics, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by nic watts</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>nic watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks that all sounds great, I think she will be wanting to take full set shots so wont need to worry about the aperture going down with zooming in, and  the 28mm lens sounds good for this. It would be brilliant if you get a chance to check the camera noises, I think that is the only potential problem. It looks like a great camera, cant wait to actually use it!
Thanks so much for your help.

Nic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks that all sounds great, I think she will be wanting to take full set shots so wont need to worry about the aperture going down with zooming in, and  the 28mm lens sounds good for this. It would be brilliant if you get a chance to check the camera noises, I think that is the only potential problem. It looks like a great camera, cant wait to actually use it!<br />
Thanks so much for your help.</p>
<p>Nic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by admin</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>It sounds pretty much like the perfect camera for what your girlfriend needs.  It&#039;s like training wheels for a DSLR, you can use it on mostly automatic settings and gradually start exploring more of the manual options as you get more comfortable.

The f2.0 lens is awesome for low light, so you will be able to get better shots with a faster shutter speed than with most other compacts.  Because of the subject you would be shooting (actors) + the lighting challenge you will want to keep shutter speed as high as possible to reduce shake.  You&#039;ll need the wide aperture and the pretty decent high ISO settings to accomplish this.  Stage lighting should be enough that you really wouldn&#039;t need a flash so a compact should work fine (plus the actors would hate your girlfriend if she used a flash during performances).

One thing that you need to know is that f2.0 only applies at the widest angle setting.  If you start zooming into your subject then the aperture drops off.  

@ 28mm the widest aperture is f2.0
@ 105mm the widest aperture is f4.9
Unfortunatly I can&#039;t tell you exactly how the f stop lines up with focal length but here is an approximation:
28mm - f2
35mm -f2.8
50mm - f3.5
85mm - f4.5
105mm - f4.9

So if your girlfriend needs to zoom in to capture an actors face she needs to know that she won&#039;t have the wide aperture.  What you can do instead though is crop the image during post processing to get a closeup.  You may encounter some pixellation but it&#039;s better than having a blurry/out of focus closeup.

If you were thinking of an SLR you could get a 3omm f1.4 which might be the best possible combination. For wider angles you&#039;d need to add a 11-16mm f2.8 to get the wide shots.  You&#039;ll definitely get better pics, but you&#039;re paying a lot more to do this + the hassle of changing lenses.  

Because your girlfriend is a theater designer I&#039;m assuming that she cares more about getting a wider viewing angle (I was thinking set design), so the 28mm might be enough on the S90 might be enough (just don&#039;t show her what an 11-16mm can do).

In terms of silencing the camera I haven&#039;t noticed too much noise and I&#039;m sure there is an option but I would need to check first.  I can let you know when I find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds pretty much like the perfect camera for what your girlfriend needs.  It&#8217;s like training wheels for a DSLR, you can use it on mostly automatic settings and gradually start exploring more of the manual options as you get more comfortable.</p>
<p>The f2.0 lens is awesome for low light, so you will be able to get better shots with a faster shutter speed than with most other compacts.  Because of the subject you would be shooting (actors) + the lighting challenge you will want to keep shutter speed as high as possible to reduce shake.  You&#8217;ll need the wide aperture and the pretty decent high ISO settings to accomplish this.  Stage lighting should be enough that you really wouldn&#8217;t need a flash so a compact should work fine (plus the actors would hate your girlfriend if she used a flash during performances).</p>
<p>One thing that you need to know is that f2.0 only applies at the widest angle setting.  If you start zooming into your subject then the aperture drops off.  </p>
<p>@ 28mm the widest aperture is f2.0<br />
@ 105mm the widest aperture is f4.9<br />
Unfortunatly I can&#8217;t tell you exactly how the f stop lines up with focal length but here is an approximation:<br />
28mm &#8211; f2<br />
35mm -f2.8<br />
50mm &#8211; f3.5<br />
85mm &#8211; f4.5<br />
105mm &#8211; f4.9</p>
<p>So if your girlfriend needs to zoom in to capture an actors face she needs to know that she won&#8217;t have the wide aperture.  What you can do instead though is crop the image during post processing to get a closeup.  You may encounter some pixellation but it&#8217;s better than having a blurry/out of focus closeup.</p>
<p>If you were thinking of an SLR you could get a 3omm f1.4 which might be the best possible combination. For wider angles you&#8217;d need to add a 11-16mm f2.8 to get the wide shots.  You&#8217;ll definitely get better pics, but you&#8217;re paying a lot more to do this + the hassle of changing lenses.  </p>
<p>Because your girlfriend is a theater designer I&#8217;m assuming that she cares more about getting a wider viewing angle (I was thinking set design), so the 28mm might be enough on the S90 might be enough (just don&#8217;t show her what an 11-16mm can do).</p>
<p>In terms of silencing the camera I haven&#8217;t noticed too much noise and I&#8217;m sure there is an option but I would need to check first.  I can let you know when I find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by nic watts</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>nic watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Hi, Ive been watching your really useful videos and am thinking about buying the s90 for my girlfriend, she is a threatre designer and needs to take shots in low light but with lots of contrast with areas of bright light in the shot. I was wondering if you knew if the s90 allows you to turn off the &#039;sounds&#039; on the camera, most cameras have the &#039;click&#039; sound when actually taking the shots,  she needs the camera to be completely silent.  I was also wondering if you knew if this would be a good compact for this type of photography, I am assuming it is from the large aperture and CCD digital sensor. We think that as we are both not very experienced photographers a DSLR would be overly complex for our needs.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Best wishes,
Nic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ive been watching your really useful videos and am thinking about buying the s90 for my girlfriend, she is a threatre designer and needs to take shots in low light but with lots of contrast with areas of bright light in the shot. I was wondering if you knew if the s90 allows you to turn off the &#8217;sounds&#8217; on the camera, most cameras have the &#8216;click&#8217; sound when actually taking the shots,  she needs the camera to be completely silent.  I was also wondering if you knew if this would be a good compact for this type of photography, I am assuming it is from the large aperture and CCD digital sensor. We think that as we are both not very experienced photographers a DSLR would be overly complex for our needs.<br />
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Nic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by admin</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Yep, still using the camera... not disappointed in the purchase at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, still using the camera&#8230; not disappointed in the purchase at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by Khalid</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Are you still using the camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Are you still using the camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by admin</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>The camera takes ok pictures as is and you have different presets (auto-modes) that you can use if you don&#039;t feel comfortable with manual control.  No camera (not even the $8,000 pro-DSLR&#039;s) will take great pictures out of the box.

I advise you to learn to edit pictures, you&#039;ll find that with just a little effort you can make a good picture look fantastic by changing the exposure and saturation slightly.  Don&#039;t bother learning photoshop it is way too complicated for beginners, instead check out Google Picasa.  It&#039;s free and will do about 90% of the tasks that most photographers need for picture editing.  Also there are plenty of sites and tutorial where you can learn from other Picasa users.

I currently use Adobe Lightroom, which I consider somewhere in between Photoshop and Picasa.  It&#039;s a great program and I&#039;d recommend it as a next purchase for anyone who wants to move beyond Picasa for their picture editing.

Scroll through the comments, I&#039;ve posted a few pictures that are unedited when I first got the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The camera takes ok pictures as is and you have different presets (auto-modes) that you can use if you don&#8217;t feel comfortable with manual control.  No camera (not even the $8,000 pro-DSLR&#8217;s) will take great pictures out of the box.</p>
<p>I advise you to learn to edit pictures, you&#8217;ll find that with just a little effort you can make a good picture look fantastic by changing the exposure and saturation slightly.  Don&#8217;t bother learning photoshop it is way too complicated for beginners, instead check out Google Picasa.  It&#8217;s free and will do about 90% of the tasks that most photographers need for picture editing.  Also there are plenty of sites and tutorial where you can learn from other Picasa users.</p>
<p>I currently use Adobe Lightroom, which I consider somewhere in between Photoshop and Picasa.  It&#8217;s a great program and I&#8217;d recommend it as a next purchase for anyone who wants to move beyond Picasa for their picture editing.</p>
<p>Scroll through the comments, I&#8217;ve posted a few pictures that are unedited when I first got the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon PowerShot S90 Review by Twindy</title>
		<link>http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Twindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakeconomy.com/2009/10/canon-powershot-s90-review/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Does this camera take great pictures without photo-shopping the photos after? Because I do not know how to edit photos at all, and I am looking for a camera that can take great pictures from the get go without editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this camera take great pictures without photo-shopping the photos after? Because I do not know how to edit photos at all, and I am looking for a camera that can take great pictures from the get go without editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
